Re: Windows 95

[Ken Yap <ken@syd.dit.csiro.au>]

>Gero wrote:
>
>Nothing in mknbi-dos has changed from 0.5.2 to 0.5.3. However, you should
>be able to use it right as it is. At least I was able to boot the MS-DOS,
>which comes as the basis of Windows-95 (I think it's called MS-DOS version
>7.0) without a problem, and I also got reports that it's possible to boot
>a full Windows-95 without any changes to mknbi-dos. Please note that the
>documents for which you have given the URL, describes a setup using a
>commercial bootrom, which is not compatible with netboot or etherboot.
>
>gero.

Could the person/people who succeeded in doing this (boot W95 with
mknbi-dos) please write up the instructions and send it to the mailing
list and put the document on the netboot web site perhaps?  Personally
I don't need it but it seems to be a frequently asked question.

	Thanks, Ken