>Perhaps. However, with Asus P5A (unfortunately most of our motherboards >are of this type) all revisions give exactly the same problems. I also >tried to compare the eepro100 driver in etherboot package and in the Linux >kernel, since Linux kernel drivers works okay for all card revisions in >all motherboards, but I don't know enough about device drivers to tell >what is the difference. Is there anything preventing the etherboot eepro100 >driver to initialize and probe the card in the same way than Linux kernel >driver does? Linux drivers have no connection with Etherboot drivers except perhaps as a source of reverse engineering info. The software framework is different.* As to whether or not the Etherboot driver does the probe in the same way as the Linux driver depends on the person who did the "port". Feel free to modify the source and send back updates, hint hint. * As to why they are different, long story, but basically different origins and tight memory environment for the operating environment of boot ROMs. The NILO project hopes to unify everything under Linux/*BSD drivers but that's some time off, check the NILO mailing list for updates. =========================================================================== This Mail was sent to netboot mailing list by: Ken Yap <ken@nlc.net.au> To get help about this list, send a mail with 'help' as the only string in it's body to majordomo@baghira.han.de. If you have problems with this list, send a mail to netboot-owner@baghira.han.de.
For requests or suggestions regarding this mailing list archive please write to netboot@gkminix.han.de.