Marty Connor wrote: > > I've updated rom-o-matic.net with Etherboot 4.7.19. > > So please make a ROM image for Valentines Day :-) > > (and let us know how it goes -- the development releases can only get > better if people try them and let us know of problems/suggestions) > > Regards, > > Marty I had a little bit of a play with the ROM-O-Matic a couple of weeks back. Looks really cool. Alas, there appears to be a configuration bug that affects not only the ROM-O-Matic, but Etherboot in general. If you select "NOINT19" in the Config file (or the equivalent ROM-O-Matic), it still generates a boot ROM with INT19H support. The reason is that the loader.S file needs to be re-assembled with nasm or equivalent - this is the only place where this Config switch is used. Why do I care about INT19? I am nurgling a NeonTech (www.neontech.com) NTV-1000 which I picked up real cheap (A$200, about US$2.50 :) and am getting it going with Etherboot. It has a BIOS which doesn't do INT19, on account of the fact that it doesn't have any disks etc. (boots from a Flash ROM). I have hacked Etherboot in, after hacking the loader.S file to allow NOINT19 and now have it sending out DHCP requests on it's Ethernet port. I still need to solve the problem of it using the all ones MAC address (ie. the broadcast address) as it's own - I think that it's serial EEPROM may not be programmed. Just thought you all might like to know. Cheers, Bob Edwards. =========================================================================== This Mail was sent to netboot mailing list by: Bob Edwards <Robert.Edwards@anu.edu.au> To get help about this list, send a mail with 'help' as the only string in it's body to majordomo@baghira.han.de. If you have problems with this list, send a mail to netboot-owner@baghira.han.de.
For requests or suggestions regarding this mailing list archive please write to netboot@gkminix.han.de.