>Are there any complications with using NFS-swap? Somebody tryed to use it?
I would like to use NFS-swap, but I haven't seen a recent patch.
(My diskless have only 16MB ram and I want to use it for sthOuch...
better than fvwm2 - maybe GNOME? or KDE? - which would be better in yourBoth of these DEs are memory pigs - we use KDE but we have 64 Mb ram on the
opinion?
need also StarOffice and Netscape - where can i get older version ofOlder distros will have older versions of netscape - most linux types have some older
netscape? (for linux of course)
Tere's also problem of speed. I know that NFS was designed a long time agorsize = 8192, wsize = 8192
and is slower than for ex. samba. I tryied to make it faster by using
rsize=8128 and wsize=8128 (maybe the number is "a little" wrong - i can't
remember) But i can't see it got better (i get 100KB/sec).Are you using el-cheapo NE-2000 compatible NICs? A high quality, well supported
Somewhere i've read about sth. faster than NFS (it's name was XFS or sthBe fair - it sounds like you're trying to get modern performance out of obselete gear,
like that) but i can't find it anymore.
Has anyoune used it? Or has any sugestions?
It's really too slow for normal use now.
Technically, you could try putting /usr on a samba server and mounting
/usr with smbfs,
but I doubt that that's going to work too well.
Realise that nobody is working too hard on the NFS implementation
for linux. Its pretty
slow, and people seem much more interested in CODA than doing NFS v3
(we only have
NFS v2).
And don't try to compile anything on your diskless workstations. Its _painful_.
Crispin
-- --- Q: Do you smoke? A: Only when set on fire...
For requests or suggestions regarding this mailing list archive please write to netboot@gkminix.han.de.